編者:陳妍茵
2019-11-12(濫權紀錄)
詳細資料 |
|
事件編號 | 201910005 |
來源 | 香港城市大學學生會城市廣播 |
網絡連結 | https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=3243444099016115&id=207097505984138 |
日期及時間 | 2019-10-01 |
警察行徑 | 濫用武力 |
以下為相關新聞節錄:
【十一荃灣開槍完整片段】無警示近距離開槍 延誤救治至少三分鐘
較早前盧偉聰召開記者會,回應於十月一日荃灣示威中,有警員近距離槍擊示威者心口事件。他聲稱「警員曾警告但無效,生命受嚴重威脅,逼於無奈使用佩槍,制止暴力襲擊,做法合法及合理。」他又聲稱在場警員隨即為傷者止血及施救。本台記者從另一角度拍攝到事發經過,發現與警方描述有所出入。
盧偉聰於記者會聲稱警員曾向示威者警告但無效,而警員感到生命受嚴重威脅,逼於無奈使用佩槍。然而,片段顯示警員舉槍時先指向前方示威者頭部,然後指向右方的示威者於不足一米的距離內向左胸開槍,整個過程不足一秒,並未有向在場市民作任何警示。
盧又聲稱有人向受傷倒地的傷者及警員投擲汽油彈。然而錄影片段中只有一枚汽油彈於警員位置五米外落地,而在場警員亦無為中槍倒地的傷者進行保護或急救,只站在一旁及制服一名示威者,期間該警員更聲稱:「First-aid 我都有啦」。
盧又聲稱在場警員隨即為傷者止血及施救,但片段中顯示傷者中槍倒地後至少三分鐘,除了正在制服示威者的警員外,在旁六位警員仍沒有施救,期間中槍者多次高喊「救命」,惟警員仍沒有理會,直至三分鐘後方有警員低頭查看傷者。片段亦顯示中槍後至少五分鐘,仍未有警方急救員到場施救。
Earlier, Commission of Police, Stephen Lo responded in a press release that an officer fired point blank at a protester in the 1st of October protest. Lo claimed, "the officer had warned the protesters but to no avail and he had felt that his life was in grave danger. He had no choice but to stop violence with his gun, all is legal and legitimate." He also claimed that the officers IMMEDIATELY treated the victim's wounds to save him. Our reporters recorded the incident from a different angle, which seems to speak differently of these claims. First, Commission Lo argues that the protesters had not heeded the police's warnings, causing the officer to "feel that he was in grave danger" and needed to use his gun. However, footage shows that the officer first points his gun to protester's head in front of him, then to his right, firing at a protester in less than 1 meter. This transition lasted less than a second, making it impossible for any 'warning' to have been issued. Second, Lo argues that someone had thrown a petrol bomb at the fallen protesters and police. However, footage reveals that there had only been one such object thrown, falling onto somewhere 5 meters away from them. No police officers could be seen doing anything for the protester shot at all, but were busy subduing another protester or just watching. Also, Lo argued that the police had IMMEDIATELY treated his wounds, but footage reveals that the shot protester was left on the ground for AT LEAST 3 minutes completely ignored. The shot protester was screaming "SAVE ME", yet the police officer had stayed clear away from him. Only after 3 minutes had there been an officer checking on him. For well over 5 minutes, no police officer could be seen treating his wounds.
最後更新:2019-11-12
濫權紀錄
從片段中可見,該少女被制服於地上後,其中一名防暴警員就如失控般阻止任何人上前了解,期間有市民不斷哀求警員不要太過重手,而當被按於地上的少女在疑似呼吸困難及驚恐過度的情況下,希望拉著其中一名防暴警員之腳部求救,該警員不單沒有理會,並且一腳踏於少女的手上,少女當場慘叫。在此以後,有救護員嘗試靠近幫少女處理手部傷勢,卻遭警員阻止,警員更一度將少女押返警處。
濫權紀錄
在影片10秒警員對市民喝罵,不禮貌對待及恐嚇市民。
濫權紀錄
警員捕捉示威者回警察防線,然後分別一名警員先扣著示威者頭部,另一名警員則不停用棍打示威者背部,即使示威者倒地,施暴仍沒有停止。其後警員用警棍頂著示威者頭部,而後面的警員則瞄準示威者頭部,短距離噴射胡椒噴霧。這涉嫌違反《公安條例》第17條中,表明警務人員在阻止公眾聚集舉行,或停止或解散公眾聚集時,只可以使用「合理所需的武力」。而過份武力對待被拘捕人士,在沒有合理辨解下,亦可能違反《侵害人身罪條例》各 ...